Alberta construction group urges support for Gateway

pipe495x245
NGPblogThumb
Tags:
Author: Northern Gateway
Dated: 11 April 2012

A workers association says Alberta NDP policy of opposing Northern Gateway because it will transport bitumen is a recipe to kill jobs and prosperity.

The Alberta Merit Contractors Association calls on the NDP to support both Gateway and Keystone XL, which proposes to transport Alberta oil to the U.S. Gulf Coast, as a way to boost viability of the oil sands – a big contributor to the provincial economy.

“Thousands of construction and energy industry jobs are currently tied to recovering bitumen. The NDP plan could result in these valuable resources being shut-in and would result in lost opportunities and jobs for Albertans," says Stephen Kushner, president of the Association that represents over 1,300 contractor firms employing over 40,000 workers in commercial, institutional and industrial construction sectors.

The NDP has said it is in favour of the pipelines, but only if they are exporting upgraded bitumen. What’s lost on the NDP is that Northern Gateway will be constructed so that it can carry both diluted bitumen and upgraded product.

The Association says it is a supporter of the “Refine it Where We Mine it” coalition dedicated to adding value to Alberta's energy resource chain by boosting oil sands crude oil refining capacity in the province.  

The NDP’s policy of exporting only refined product is not achievable, says Kushner. And if Gateway and Keystone aren’t built, Albertans would be forced to “give up” tremendous benefits.

"Prevailing markets and economics are saying that fully realizing the goal of refining all of our resource products must be phased in over time.” Kushner stated in a recent news release. “The NDP's stand against moving forward on the pipeline projects, as soon as possible, means they want Albertans to give up tremendous opportunities that exist today. Their plan is merely a wishful hope that uncertain global conditions in the distant future will provide suitable economic conditions to attract the multi-billions of dollars of private investment needed to build each upgrader or refinery."

If you’ve been following the oil refining debate, as we have, you’d know that upgraders and refineries are running at, or near, peak capacity in Alberta.

Currently, oil exported from Canada is sold at a significant discount to the global price. Analysis by Scotiabank released March 28, 2012, as reported here, found that discount to be over $30 per barrel. That’s a lot of money left on the table for Canadian producers, their employees and investors, as well as for government programs funded in part by revenue generated through royalties and corporate taxes.

“Canada needs to increase export capability by building more pipeline capacity,” said Patricia Mohr, a Scotiabank analyst, in her monthly commodities index report. “Secondly, we need to diversify away from just the U.S. Midwest market [and] the third thing, which I'm beginning to be a little concerned about, is that the growth of U.S. petroleum demand is extremely slow. Last year it actually declined.”

It’s clear that Canada needs to open new markets for its oil exports in order to achieve maximum value. It’s also clear that Northern Gateway is an important step towards this goal.

One thing to remember that an argument in favour of boosting refining capacity in Alberta is NOT an argument against Northern Gateway, despite the proclamations by the NDP.

Northern Gateway will be able to ship both.

Post your comment

All comments are moderated, not based on their opinion, but on the presentation of fact-based and constructive dialogue and compliance with our terms and conditions.
Comments
  • John, Feb 26th, 2013 (2 years ago)

    I think its a great idea

  • Northern Gateway, Apr 30th, 2012 (2 years ago)

    Hi Juliette, thanks for your comment.

    This blog post and the blog its on is dedicated to discussing jobs and benefits related to Northern Gateway. If you're interested in discussing other issues related to the project, there are five other subject themes listed in the menu on the left, including the Oil and Energy blog which includes posts on Enbridge's efforts in the renewable energy sector, like this one: http://www.northerngateway.ca/news-and-media/northern-gateway-blogs/oil-and-energy/enbridge-generates-more-solar-power/

    Respectfully, we disagree with the statement "the vast majority don't want this pipeline." A January 2012, independent nation-wide poll found support for the project is greater than opposition: http://www.northerngateway.ca/news-and-media/northern-gateway-blogs/trade-diversification-for-canada/strong-support-for-northern-gateway-poll/

    Another poll found that 75 per cent of Canadians believe Canada should diversify its energy export markets beyond the United States, which is what Northern Gateway will help to achieve: http://www.lfpress.com/news/canada/2012/02/01/19326076.html

  • Juliette, Apr 30th, 2012 (2 years ago)

    Enough about jobs already! We get it, the pipeline will create jobs...so will alternative energy, and at much less of a risk. How about you try asking Canadians. The vast majority don't want this pipeline and last I checked, we're still a democracy. This should be up to the entire country, not just those who will benefit from it.
    I'm sure this comment will be suppressed, but at least someone somewhere will see it. For shame.

  • Malcolm Dunderdale, Apr 22nd, 2012 (3 years ago)

    I believe boosting refinery capacity on site at the Tar Sands......then use the refined product to produce Electricity.......feed the Electricity into the National Grid system....any thing left over sell it to the US (ELECTRICITY that is)...this way no pipelines, no tankers and Canadian jobs into perpetuity...I believe this is the safest way to proceed.....in the mean time continue to look for alternate energy.....let's lead by example and help keep Canada clean.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments

Share this page